Find out what you’ve actually got
before you spend another pound.
A fixed-fee audit of your idea, your codebase, or the app an agency left behind. What’s solid, what’s broken, what it costs to finish, and whether it’s worth finishing. In writing.
What’s really there.
Code quality, security, the shortcuts that will bite, the parts worth keeping. A developer’s honest read, translated into plain English.
What it costs to finish.
A scoped price for the path we’d recommend, so your next decision is made on numbers instead of hope.
What we’d do instead.
If there’s a smaller fix that gets you live sooner, the audit says so. We’ve scoped people down to a fraction of what they asked for, and off builds entirely.
Give us access to the code, or just the idea if there’s no code yet. We review it properly, then deliver a written verdict: state of what exists, the risks, the recommended path, and a fixed price for it. Yours to act on with us or with anyone else.
“The audit told us not to build the thing we asked for. They scoped a smaller fix for a fraction of the budget instead. That’s the moment we trusted them with everything else.”
Asked before booking. Answered straight.
Won’t you just recommend an expensive rebuild?
Our audits have talked clients out of builds, that’s the quote on this page. The audit is the product: a wrong recommendation would kill the trust that everything else here runs on.
What exactly do I get?
A written report: what’s solid, what’s broken, security and risk flags, salvage-or-restart verdict with reasons, and a fixed quote for the recommended path. Readable by a human, useful to any developer.
My developer says everything’s fine.
Maybe it is, and then the audit costs you a small fee to know for sure. A second opinion on software is like one on a survey: cheap next to finding out the expensive way.