Your team re-types shipping docs.
Your competitor’s doesn’t.
For freight and logistics operators drowning in shipping documents. Read from the inbox, extracted, checked, and pushed into your TMS with nobody re-typing anything.
Read on arrival.
Bills of lading, manifests, commercial invoices, delivery notes: read and understood as they hit the inbox, in whatever format the shipper sends.
Checked before it counts.
Missing reference, odd total, mismatched consignee? Flagged for a human before it enters your system, not discovered after the customer calls.
Into your TMS, untouched.
Pushed straight into the system you already run. The live build feeds CargoWise; the approach fits whatever you operate.
We watch how one document type moves from inbox to TMS today, then build the pipeline for that one type and run it alongside your team until it’s trusted. Then the next type. Each one proven before the next, which is why it sticks.
“Half an hour of manual work gone from every document, conservatively. They were re-typing every shipping doc into Excel, then into their TMS by hand. Now it’s pulled straight from email, extracted, and pushed into the TMS on its own. Documents processed have doubled every month for three months straight.”
Asked before booking. Answered straight.
Every shipper sends a different format.
That’s the normal case, and exactly what this handles. It reads documents the way your ops team does, by understanding them, not by matching a fixed template that breaks weekly.
We run CargoWise. Will it actually integrate?
The live build pushes into CargoWise today. Other TMSs are the same pattern. If we genuinely can’t connect yours, we tell you at the audit, before you’ve spent anything real.
What happens when it misreads something?
Anything below your confidence bar goes to a human with the doubt highlighted. Wrong-and-silent is the failure mode we build against, because in freight a silent error costs more than the typing ever did.